Search:

Type: Posts; User: TomH1138;

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.07 seconds.

  1. Thread: The Hobbit

    by TomH1138
    Replies
    684
    Views
    35,365

    Yes! And furthermore, Movie Bob is spot-on as...

    Yes! And furthermore, Movie Bob is spot-on as usual.
  2. Replies
    147
    Views
    4,378

    Yay! I hope so.

    Yay! I hope so.
  3. Replies
    147
    Views
    4,378

    Ugh. The main thing I want from DoFP is for it to...

    Ugh. The main thing I want from DoFP is for it to undo most of X3.

    Of course, maybe this is showing us the timeline before the change... :)
  4. Replies
    20
    Views
    344

    Thanks to everyone for the thoughtful and...

    Thanks to everyone for the thoughtful and insightful (and sometimes funny) comments! This is exactly the kind of discussion I was hoping for.

    This isn't the kind of thing that keeps me up at night...
  5. Replies
    43
    Views
    609

    01010100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01010010...

    01010100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01010010 01101111 01111001 01100001 01101100 01100101 00100000 01110111 01101001 01110100 01101000 00100000 01100011 01101000 01100101 01100101 01110011 01100101...
  6. Replies
    43
    Views
    609

    01110010 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101111...

    01110010 01100101 00100000 01110100 01101111 00100000 01100100 01110010 01101001 01101110 01101011 00100000 01001111 01110110 01100001 01101100 01110100 01101001 01101110 01100101 00101110
  7. Replies
    20
    Views
    344

    Heh heh. :) Sure, I think I see what you're...

    Heh heh. :) Sure, I think I see what you're saying. And you make a lot of good points, too!

    I thought of an example of where I think Ebert got it right: He gave 3 1/2 stars to Aliens, citing the...
  8. Replies
    20
    Views
    344

    Well, I've seen more of those than the artsy...

    Well, I've seen more of those than the artsy films, so I can think of more examples of that than I can the other kind.

    Also, I avoided movies that tend to split audiences because they do fall more...
  9. Replies
    20
    Views
    344

    Thanks for your kind words, kellen! (And it looks...

    Thanks for your kind words, kellen! (And it looks like you're new to the forums, so welcome!)

    Your comments about the low attention span reminded me of something that Maltin said in his 3-star...
  10. Replies
    20
    Views
    344

    Why do movie critics lie to us?

    Have I got your attention with that? :) I confess that the title is a little bit tongue-in-cheek. But it does refer to something that genuinely annoys me.

    When I was growing up, I loved all kinds...
  11. Replies
    1,422
    Views
    50,020

    This turned out to be a stunt by the folks at...

    This turned out to be a stunt by the folks at FunnyOrDie.com:

    http://mashable.com/2014/03/04/huvr-videos/
  12. To be fair, it sounds like he made that trailer a...

    To be fair, it sounds like he made that trailer a couple of years ago when that music was less ubiquitous.
  13. Man, what I wouldn't give to see the full thing. ...

    Man, what I wouldn't give to see the full thing.

    I like Omaryu's (?) suggestion on the main page that Topher Grace post the cutlist so we can reconstruct it at home if we wish...if he made a...
  14. Replies
    5
    Views
    102

    A while back, in a thread on this very forum,...

    A while back, in a thread on this very forum, someone actually suggested that fan filmmakers ought to just remake the prequels.

    My response was that, as much as I'd like to see them remade...
  15. Replies
    24
    Views
    611

    I see your point, baileym. But the producers are...

    I see your point, baileym. But the producers are also banking on the name recognition, which is the absurd thing on their part. If this is targeted to a younger generation that doesn't care about the...
  16. Replies
    1,233
    Views
    81,506

    No, that's OK. I understand your points much...

    No, that's OK. I understand your points much better now. I came off a little cranky, too. Sorry. :)
  17. Replies
    1,233
    Views
    81,506

    This kind of thing has been talked about since...

    This kind of thing has been talked about since the initial announcement in October of 2012. I'm not sure why it's such a shocker now.



    Who cares about what else they've done? They've been in...
  18. Replies
    146
    Views
    5,134

    Sounds like they're trying to settle down the fan...

    Sounds like they're trying to settle down the fan outrage by making a quick continuity change. I would doubt that anything more would come of it. But who knows?
  19. Replies
    1,422
    Views
    50,020

    Based on the heavy current usage of the...

    Based on the heavy current usage of the character, I thought that he was already in the public domain. Two TV series and a movie franchise -- that's a lot for one character at one time.
  20. I heartily agree!

    I heartily agree!
  21. I actually didn't mean that as an insult. I was...

    I actually didn't mean that as an insult. I was mainly talking about the level of overall popularity and acclaim in the culture. Daniel Craig's James Bond lives in a universe where Dr. No never...
  22. Thread: Doctor Who

    by TomH1138
    Replies
    384
    Views
    14,367

    Looks phenomenal!

    Looks phenomenal!
  23. Thread: Doctor Who

    by TomH1138
    Replies
    384
    Views
    14,367

    Unfortunately, we were promised tons of missing...

    Unfortunately, we were promised tons of missing episodes six months ago, and it turned out to be something like 10 (all from two serials). So I'll believe this when I see it.
  24. Article: The Dark Crystal - The Director's Cut

    You can view the page at http://www.fanedit.org/forums/content.php?840-The-Dark-Crystal-The-Director-s-Cut
  25. Despite my comments about expecting that Disney...

    Despite my comments about expecting that Disney will set the new movies in the 1920s (which I'm fine with), I really, really would like to see some honest-to-goodness WWII movies with Indy in them....
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Fanedit.org is not affiliated with Fanedit.info

Visitors to Fanedit.org are advised that all fanedits contained within the pages of the websites are believed to be fanedits and/or preservation projects of films from personal collections which fall under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include— 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2. the nature of the copyrighted work; 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. Since fanedits contained here are mainly created out of criticisms, research, and are completely nonprofit, we here at Fanedit.org believe that they fall under the requirements of the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107. However, no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information are made. Visitors are encouraged to review the official version of all documents upon which they plan to download as well as to make completely sure they own a legitimate, original copy of anything they may wish to download. The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. Fanedit.org cannot give this permission. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Links to Other Sites - Some of the linked sites are not under the control of Fanedit.org. Therefore, Fanedit.org makes no representations concerning their content, and are not responsible for their content. That Fanedit.org has provided a link to a site is not an endorsement, or an indication of affiliation with the owners or publishers of any fanedits and all related materials. There are risks in using any information, services or fanedits found on the Internet via any outside links; and Fanedit.org cautions you to make sure that you completely understand these risks before retrieving, using, relying upon, or downloading anything via the Internet. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Members, Fanedits and Links. Fanedit.org reserves the right to refuse services at any time. Notification that Information Provided by You is Public Information Any information provided by you to Fanedit.org, including but not limited to feedback, questions, comments, suggestions, download links, etc., etc., are considered non-confidential since it is a public website; moreover, such information is a public record subject to public inspection pursuant to law. Fanedit.org has no obligation of any kind with respect to such information and cannot be held responsible for the decisions nor the actions of any individuals of the entire Internet community at large. By downloading any fanedit, the downloader assumes all responsibilities thereof as well as all the consequences that may incur. CONSIDER YOURSELF WARNED!