Originally Posted by theslime
This only goes to show I'm right about the Nolans. If someone can do it, they can.
Originally Posted by theslime
Yes! People accuse Nolan of being soulless and cold, but both The Dark Knight and Inception are really sentimental stories at heart. (Inception didn't really work all that well for me, though.) That's why I think he's one of the few who could have done Robin justice.
Yeah, sorry for the nonsensical free-associative rant about Hush. I just think he neatly encapsulates everything that's wrong with noughties comics. Everything is DARK. Everything has a PAST. It's emotional torture porn. There's no flair for imagery, there's no vaudeville. I accept that Batman is the gritty, realist superhero, but that's no excuse for making superhero comics BORING. Jeph Loeb (the creator of Hush) isn't the worst at all, it permeates most of the business. (Although I see more interesting and imaginative stories happening now; I think the worst crap is over.) Even the otherwise-trustworthy Grant Morrison went in that direction with Batman: R.I.P - although the sheer imagination overload of that story makes it better than the generic shock value crap.
So it's settled then! Someone get Nolan on the phone!
We want a dark, gritty and sombre Dick Grayson!
Although I have to admit, as an alter persona, I like Nightwing more than Robin.
The past remains the same; his parents' death, and all that psycho jiggamacrap, but purely based on the superhero character itself, I prefer Nightwing.
I'm really sorry but Batman Forever and Batman & Robin killed every single ounce of hope I have of Nolan coming up with anything good --if ever--, regarding Robin, Riddler, and/or Freeze. Although, as we agreed on, the latter doesn't fit the Nolan-verse.
I'm not hoping for squat until I'm in the theatre and see the end credits rolling.
Nolan has always had an interest in Psychology and how the mind works, I wouldn't be surprised if he covers Scarface & the Ventrilogquist in the next movie, though I can't imagine any scenario where that would be plausible, more like a homage to Psycho.
Looking forward to seeing if Scarface and Ventriliquist will be in the next film. I'm hoping that it is. Cause that'd be pretty sweet. Plus Scarface is still a good way of moving things from the mob to the freaks.
I still think Nolan was clueless about making that transition from the mob to the freaks. He had the perfect way to do so in Batman Begins, and I actually thought he would use the Scarecrow's gas to justify all those loonies popping up in later films. Clever and plausible solution. But he just did not use it, much to my annoyance.
I'm not sure Iike the title, it feels a little lazy.
Nolan has confirmed there will be no Robin whilst he's around. Bale said something similar I believe. I think we may see a completely new villain.
Completely new? That would be overkill. At least stick to someone we know.
I liked the idea of having the Riddler because that might mean putting the detective angle back into Batman. Let's not forget he first appeared, and still appears, in a magazine called Detective Comics, and he is not only a detective but the world's greatest detective, no less. However, the movies keep ignoring that fact, going instead for the brutal avenger (Burton) or the urban soldier/Ethan Hunt in an armor (Nolan).
I still hope some day, someone will get the character totally right on screen.
Oh, and the title totally sucks. It sounds like a first chapter, not a last one.
As a Holmes fan, I've always had a slight bitterness about this 'fact' however, Batman has teamed up with Sherlock in an episode of Brave & The Bold. Although it would be nice to see him doing a little more detective work in any medium. Supposedly in Arkham Asylum there were going to be actual clues to analyse, but the programmers felt it was going to slow the pace of the game down, which is why we have the simplified 'follow the trail of DNA' segments instead.
Originally Posted by DwightFry78
Fanedit.org is not affiliated with Fanedit.info
Visitors to Fanedit.org are advised that all fanedits contained within the pages of the websites are believed to be fanedits and/or preservation projects of films from personal collections which fall under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include— 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2. the nature of the copyrighted work; 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. Since fanedits contained here are mainly created out of criticisms, research, and are completely nonprofit, we here at Fanedit.org believe that they fall under the requirements of the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107. However, no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information are made. Visitors are encouraged to review the official version of all documents upon which they plan to download as well as to make completely sure they own a legitimate, original copy of anything they may wish to download. The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. Fanedit.org cannot give this permission. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Links to Other Sites - Some of the linked sites are not under the control of Fanedit.org. Therefore, Fanedit.org makes no representations concerning their content, and are not responsible for their content. That Fanedit.org has provided a link to a site is not an endorsement, or an indication of affiliation with the owners or publishers of any fanedits and all related materials. There are risks in using any information, services or fanedits found on the Internet via any outside links; and Fanedit.org cautions you to make sure that you completely understand these risks before retrieving, using, relying upon, or downloading anything via the Internet. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Members, Fanedits and Links. Fanedit.org reserves the right to refuse services at any time. Notification that Information Provided by You is Public Information Any information provided by you to Fanedit.org, including but not limited to feedback, questions, comments, suggestions, download links, etc., etc., are considered non-confidential since it is a public website; moreover, such information is a public record subject to public inspection pursuant to law. Fanedit.org has no obligation of any kind with respect to such information and cannot be held responsible for the decisions nor the actions of any individuals of the entire Internet community at large. By downloading any fanedit, the downloader assumes all responsibilities thereof as well as all the consequences that may incur. CONSIDER YOURSELF WARNED!