Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,323
    News Credit
    0
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)

    Cracked.com Highlights "Star Wars: Revisited"

    Last edited by DominicCobb; 07-03-2012 at 11:32 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    In the ghetto
    Posts
    11,156
    News Credit
    61
    Mentioned
    138 Post(s)
    That's dope!
    Go then, there are other worlds than these.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    1,715
    News Credit
    0
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Wow, I love everything in that article. Great to see Adywan's work getting representation, and all of the other things mentioned in that article are great examples of the value of fan-related content.

    The only thing I disagree with in the commentary about Adywan's version is "that a lot of his changes would make the Internet just as mad as Lucas' if they had come from him." Actually, no. He doesn't change the plot or make characters do stupid things or make characters look freaky. Most of the changes are unnoticeable until they're pointed out, and the ones that are, are improvements.

    Adywan did what George Lucas claimed that he was going to do, but didn't actually do. Lucas claimed that he was simply going to touch up the effects. Instead, he made Han a wimp by not shooting first, Darth Vader a moron by adding in that "NOOOOO!" and gave pupils to Ewoks, something that no fan asked for, ever. If the issue was technology of the time, was James Earl Jones incapable of saying "No" in 1983? Who would even think of changing the Ewoks' eyes even as a joke?

    Meanwhile, what fan would complain about the removal of bushes, or the fixing of that bizarre wolf hand, or the addition of Chewie's medal? These are all great changes and exactly the kind of thing that George Lucas should be actually fixing.

    Anyway, thanks for sharing the link!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Woodinville, Washington, United States
    Posts
    439
    News Credit
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Very excited that more people are swelling into the ranks, though I would say... I'm a bit leery of the widespread attention. I swear, if Lucasfilm shuts down ESB:R after we've waited for years...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    12,800
    News Credit
    1
    Mentioned
    76 Post(s)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    5,879
    News Credit
    0
    Mentioned
    86 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TomH1138 View Post
    Who would even think of changing the Ewoks' eyes even as a joke?
    RX-FE TRAILERS:

    Spoiler:
    Code:
    THE PHANTOM MENACE S8 CUT: https://vimeo.com/45235207
    ATTACK OF THE CLONES S8 CUT: https://vimeo.com/18619798
    REVENGE OF THE SITH S8 CUT: https://vimeo.com/31009008
    PROMETHEUS S8 CUT: https://vimeo.com/38763238
    SUPER 8 S8 CUT: https://vimeo.com/61584745
    ALIEN S8 CUT: https://vimeo.com/49831261
    ALIEN S8 CUT BONUS TRAILERS: https://vimeo.com/60720721
    APOLLO 13 S8 CUT: https://vimeo.com/36720849
    DREDD DIGEST EDITION: https://vimeo.com/63969394
    PUBLIC ENEMY: https://vimeo.com/41636583
    300 SILENT CUT: https://vimeo.com/31014623
    300 SILENT CUT TRAILER 2: https://vimeo.com/48672351
    SGT. JOHN: https://vimeo.com/39781272
    SGT. JOHN TRAILER 2: https://vimeo.com/49899071
    SGT. JOHN TRAILER 3: https://vimeo.com/76889206
    ROGUE PLANET: https://vimeo.com/51537283
    PLANET OF THE VAMPIRES: https://vimeo.com/44177403
    ZOMBIES OF THE STRATOSHPERE: https://vimeo.com/45366726

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    1,715
    News Credit
    0
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TV's Frink View Post
    Tom, you would be surprised to know how much flak ady has gotten for ANH:R. Even, and I am not making this up, death threats.
    Oh, wow. So, do these people just hate any changes, or are George's changes the only ones that are OK with them?

    Seeing as how Ady isn't forcing anyone to accept his version - he's not charging money and he's not putting it out as the definitive version; you have to really go out of your way to get a copy - these people are deeply disturbed and wrong. They need to be (more) heavily medicated and perhaps institutionalized for life!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    1,715
    News Credit
    0
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rogue-theX View Post
    Heh. Yeah, but this was in response to what George had done.

    When the "Nooooo!" in RotJ was first released, some people thought it was an Internet hoax. I said that it couldn't be, because what Star Wars fan would ever even think of that, joke or not? It was a moment that was so completely unneeded or asked for.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    568
    News Credit
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    To quote some reviews on piratebay


    Just to add, don't you think you went a bit over the top with the changes? Surely the mistakes - if you want to call them that - are part of the original version or even the 1990s CGI improved version? If you're actually changing scenes, adding new effects then that is a bit wrong as the film wasn't meant to look the way you think it's meant to look. I can understand colour grading alterations and sound improvement but actually changing scenes to suit your vision of how Star Wars should be is, with respect, wrong. Having said that, you're clearly a huge Star Wars fan but even huge fans should respect the original version and not seek to make endless changes to to it. I'm not quite sure what the point of this edit is except to show how skilled you are with editing software!


    "37 - Added a battle droid to the scrap inside the Sandcrawler."


    That's a classic example of what I'm talking about. Why would you want to add something which wasn't meant to be there in the first place????


    and


    If Adywan would have had access to never before seen footage, then I might have wanted to download this. But morons starting to edit what pros already have perfected, belong in psychiatric ward, diagnosed as being infant megalomanic.


    If you were into porn instead, I´ll bet you would fanedit "Deep Throat" thus relieving Linda Lovelace from her duties and you yourself replacing her. But that movie !!!, I would not download either...


    But I should say, I do NOT doubt the skills you people possess, dealing in theese strange genres. It´s not very easy editing even your own footage... Why don´t you try and shoot your own movie instead? New stuff I like!!! But not people trying to become from what others performed.

    Also, maybe this should be on the front page.


    http://swrevisited.wordpress.com/201...ook-challenge/


    Adywan says that as soon as we get 10,000 Likes on the Facebook Page he will post a new four minute clip! Theres already over 9000, and with 100,000 new hits on this site this week, we can surely do it quickly!
    Last edited by wabid; 07-08-2012 at 01:00 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    In the ghetto
    Posts
    11,156
    News Credit
    61
    Mentioned
    138 Post(s)
    Wabid, those comments are great examples of the "You can't please everyone" adage, especially when it comes to Star Wars fanedits.
    Go then, there are other worlds than these.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Fanedit.org is not affiliated with Fanedit.info

Visitors to Fanedit.org are advised that all fanedits contained within the pages of the websites are believed to be fanedits and/or preservation projects of films from personal collections which fall under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107, which states: Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include— 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2. the nature of the copyrighted work; 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. Since fanedits contained here are mainly created out of criticisms, research, and are completely nonprofit, we here at Fanedit.org believe that they fall under the requirements of the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107. However, no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information are made. Visitors are encouraged to review the official version of all documents upon which they plan to download as well as to make completely sure they own a legitimate, original copy of anything they may wish to download. The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material. Fanedit.org cannot give this permission. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Links to Other Sites - Some of the linked sites are not under the control of Fanedit.org. Therefore, Fanedit.org makes no representations concerning their content, and are not responsible for their content. That Fanedit.org has provided a link to a site is not an endorsement, or an indication of affiliation with the owners or publishers of any fanedits and all related materials. There are risks in using any information, services or fanedits found on the Internet via any outside links; and Fanedit.org cautions you to make sure that you completely understand these risks before retrieving, using, relying upon, or downloading anything via the Internet. Legal Disclaimer Regarding Members, Fanedits and Links. Fanedit.org reserves the right to refuse services at any time. Notification that Information Provided by You is Public Information Any information provided by you to Fanedit.org, including but not limited to feedback, questions, comments, suggestions, download links, etc., etc., are considered non-confidential since it is a public website; moreover, such information is a public record subject to public inspection pursuant to law. Fanedit.org has no obligation of any kind with respect to such information and cannot be held responsible for the decisions nor the actions of any individuals of the entire Internet community at large. By downloading any fanedit, the downloader assumes all responsibilities thereof as well as all the consequences that may incur. CONSIDER YOURSELF WARNED!